[Skip to Content]
What kinds of uses, densities, and development patterns make sense for the rebuilding areas?
Share
Parking
Jun 16, 2011 MO
0
11
4

Let's make the building facades, landscaping, pedestrian areas, etc the focal point along our roadways, instead of grayfields of way too large parking lots. Move parking behind buildings.
Also, we need maximum parking requirements, instead of minimum parking requirements. Let's face it, parking lots in the major shopping areas are only full during the holiday shopping season. Why impose regulations that address one month out of the year rather than regulations that accurately reflect the true parking needs of the developments?

4 Comments
  • comment icon

    by JSM Good idea. Also, consider safety of lots that are behind buildings.

    Jul 07, 2011 at 11:33 AM  
  • comment icon

    by Dori B I agree that parking is not the most attractive thing. But it is definitely necessary. I think a suitable answer could be parking 'decks'. They expand vertically and so you don't have so much gray area.Also, the "walking a block isn't that bad" idea..... is quite a catastrophe for the disabled.

    Jun 29, 2011 at 1:09 AM  
  • comment icon

    by Andrew_M I like the idea of moving parking lots behind the buildings. There could be a nice walkway in front of a row of stores and it would become a lot like downtown.

    Jun 23, 2011 at 12:29 PM  
  • comment icon

    by Andy Grace Looking at the satellite view of Tuscaloosa is a little depressing - huge swaths of concrete parking that are rarely ever full. More opportunities for pedestrian/bike traffic throughout the city could help change all of this, but you're right that maximum requirements are needed. Some people are completely uncomfortable with the idea that they may have to walk a block to get into the store/restaurant they want to visit. But, smaller parking lots would make folks used to this idea in hurry.

    Jun 17, 2011 at 10:00 AM  

Idea Collaboration by  MindMixer